Young Joins Senators to Urge HHS to Enforce Separate Abortion Fee Payment Requirement

WASHINGTON –U.S. Senator Todd Young (R-Ind.) joined 13 of his Senate colleagues today to encourage the Trump administration to move forward with a final rule that would ensure pro-life consumers enrolled in Affordable Care Act (ACA) health plans aren’t subsidizing abortion services.

In a letter to Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Alex Azar, the Senators expressed their support for an HHS rule on ACA Section 1303. The rule, titled “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Exchange Program Integrity,” would require policy holders to submit separate payments for basic insurance and additional coverage for abortion.  

“The proposed rule aligns with the clear meaning and congressional intent of Section 1303 by eliminating the hidden abortion surcharge in many ACA plans,” the lawmakers wrote. 

“The Hyde Amendment protects federal health care dollars from funding elective abortions and insurance plans that include elective abortion. The ACA deviated from this long-standing precedent by creating its own funding stream making taxpayer dollars available to buy abortion-covering health insurance plans in ACA exchanges throughout the country,” they said.

The Senators also strongly encouraged HHS to strengthen the final rule to clarify the illegality of the Obama administration’s interpretation of ACA Section 1303. 

“The Obama Administration’s misinterpretation created a hidden abortion surcharge on many health care plans in exchanges throughout the nation,” the letter said. “The meaning of Section 1303 is straightforward and congressional intent is clear. We are concerned that the proposed rule’s analysis fails to adequately acknowledge the illegality of the prior regulation. We ask that the final rule directly addresses this concern.” 

In addition to Senator Young, the letter was signed by Senators Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss.), James Inhofe (R-Okla.), Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.), John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), Tim Scott (R-S.C.), Deb Fischer (R-Neb.), James Lankford (R-Okla.), Steve Daines (R-Mont.), Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), and Joni Ernst (R-Iowa).

The letter is available below and here:  http://bit.ly/2CcEAZt

Dear Secretary Azar:

We write to express our support for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) proposed rule, titled “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Exchange Program Integrity,” as it relates to changing the separate payment requirement in Section 1303 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). The proposed rule aligns with the clear meaning and congressional intent of Section 1303 by eliminating the hidden abortion surcharge in many ACA plans.  We also request that the final rule clarify the illegality of the previous Administration’s interpretation of Section 1303.

The Hyde Amendment protects federal health care dollars from funding elective abortions and insurance plans that include elective abortion. The ACA deviated from this long-standing precedent by creating its own funding stream making taxpayer dollars available to buy abortion-covering health insurance plans in ACA exchanges throughout the country.

Section 1303 of the ACA requires qualified health plans (QHPs) that cover elective abortions to fund them by collecting a separate payment (sometimes referred to as an abortion surcharge) from each beneficiary and depositing these payments into a separate account. This surcharge was created to provide transparency for consumers by clearly differentiating the abortion surcharge. Section 1303 includes the following requirements:

• The health insurance issuer must not use the subsidy amount to pay for any elective abortion.
• The health insurance issuer must “collect from each plan” a “separate payment” of not less than $1 per month for any elective abortions covered.
• The health insurance issuer must deposit these separate elective abortion payments into “a separate account that consists solely of such payments and that is used exclusively to pay” for elective abortions.

During a legislative debate on Section 1303, then-Senator Ben Nelson (D-Neb.), re-stated what was clear from the language of the text itself: “You have to write two checks:  one for the basic policy and one for the additional coverage for abortion.”

The Obama Administration undermined this requirement through subsequent regulations. Despite the plain meaning of the text, it interpreted “separate” to mean “together.” The regulations stated that the requirement could be satisfied by “sending the enrollee a single monthly invoice or bill that separately itemizes the premium amount for non-excepted abortion services” and by not requiring the QHP issuer to “separately identify the premium for non-excepted abortion services on the monthly premium bill.” In other words, the “separate” payments could be made “together.” The Obama Administration’s misinterpretation created a hidden abortion surcharge on many health care plans in exchanges throughout the nation.

The meaning of Section 1303 is straightforward and congressional intent is clear. We are concerned that the proposed rule’s analysis fails to adequately acknowledge the illegality of the prior regulation. We ask that the final rule directly addresses this concern. 

We thank HHS for issuing new regulations that align with the clear meaning and congressional intent of Section 1303. Congress clearly required a distinct payment and the current regulations instead allow the abortion surcharge to be hidden within the broader premium.

This proposed rule provides important and long overdue protections. We strongly encourage the Department to finalize it promptly.